Re: [PATCH 1/6] xstat: Add a pair of system calls to make extended file stats available

David Howells <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.nfs,gmane.linux.kernel.cifs,gmane.network.samba.internals,gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4,gmane.comp.emulators.wine.devel,gmane.comp.kde.devel.kfm,gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus,gmane.linux.kernel.api
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Andreas Dilger <[email protected]> wrote:

> > The idea was initially proposed as a set of xattrs that could be
> > retrieved with getxattr(), but the general preferance proved to be
> > for new syscalls with an extended stat structure.
> 
> I would comment that it was the opposite.  It was originally a
> stat()-like extension that degraded into a messy getxattr() mess.

Ummm...  No, my first attempt was definitely through getxattr().  You even
commented on it.

> > The fields in struct xstat come in a number of classes:
> > 
> > (0) st_dev, st_blksize, st_information.
> > 
> >     These are local data and are always available.
> 
> For the extra two bits it would cost us, I don't think st_blksize
> and st_information should always be returned.

Fair enough.

> st_blksize may be variable for a distributed filesystem,

I wonder if there's a way to make this explicit - or is it something that if
the bit isn't set, you can't use the value in st_blksize.  I wonder if this
value always has to be non-zero to make sure existing stat() doesn't explode.

> and some of the fields in st_information (offline) may not be free to access
> either.

True.

David
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.