Re: How to remove menu items (where has /usr/share/nautilus/ui gone) ?

garethl <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus
Organization hmgcc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 12/06/2012 10:43, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> hi;
>
> On 12 June 2012 10:17, garethl<[email protected]>  wrote:
>
>> In which case, do you have any suggestions on how to remove menu items
>> (without rebuilding Nautilus), please?
>
> you don't - that's what I've been trying to tell you. the UI
> definition file is *code*; its contents and structure are part of the
> Nautilus code base as much as the C files. changing the contents of
> the UI definition without corresponding changes inside the C source
> code is the equivalent of poking at random bytes in the binary file.

Thanks you for your reply Emmanuele.

I completely "get" what you're saying - that this method was likely to 
result in a catastrophe, and should never, ever, ever be contemplated. 
However, what I would like confirmed is that this method, which 
definitely used to be *possible* (because I have seen it with my own 
eyes), is now *not possible*.

> if you want to remove menu items you have two options: introduce a
> setting

So you mean some setting which would be available at runtime, and has 
some (new) corresponding source code who's behavior depends on the value 
of the setting? If so, then this would have the advantage of being a 
"configurable" solution, but still needs me to rebuild Nautilus, in the 
first instance. Thanks for the idea though.

> lockdown - there is GSoC intern working on a new lockdown editor for
> Gnome 3, and reducing the capabilities of Nautilus for kiosk-like
> setups is definitely in the scope of that:
>
> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2012/trz/11001

Sounds interesting. However, it does not appear to be an existing 
solution, so will probably come too late to solve my current need.

> oh, and by the way, could you please strip (or ask you sysadmins to
> strip) the ridiculous disclaimer at the bottom of your email? it's
> legally void, and this is a public mailing list. thanks!

Sadly, no. I feel your pain, but there's nothing I can personally do 
about that any time soon. I will, however, make it a top priority to try 
and get it removed ASAP.

Regards,
Gareth

The information contained in this message (and any attachments) may
be confidential and is intended for the sole use of the named addressee.
Access, copying, alteration or re-use of the e-mail by anyone other
than the intended recipient is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient please advise the sender immediately by returning the e-mail
and deleting it from your system.

This information may be exempt from disclosure under Freedom Of Information 
Act 2000 and may be subject to exemption under other UK information 
legislation. Refer disclosure requests to the Information Officer.


The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
-- 
nautilus-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.