Re: sort by extension?

"[email protected]" <[email protected]> Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:56:09 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 06.07.2016 19:26, António Fernandes wrote:
>
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu no 
> dia quarta, 6/07/2016 às 12:11:
>
>     Hello António,
>     that's indeed a nice workaround I didn't think of yet. Thank you
>     for that.
>
> Glad to have helped :)
>
>     Still I hope some of the dev's is reading this and the
>     functionality is being considered, I really find it somewhat odd
>     that for whatever reasons this has not been implemented so far.
>
> I believe you didn't reply-to-all this message, so no dev's are 
> reading this. You need to add [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> as CC. I don't know if it was your 
> intention or not so I didn't CC the list on this reply.
Yuk! My fault. You are right, I didn't watch it while replying. This one 
should be now for everyone again (sorry everybody for confusion).

>
> In my opinion, as a nautilus user and sporadic non-programmer 
> contributor, I think it is unlikely that a sort-by-extension option 
> willl be added to the UI, even if, programming-wise, it is easy to 
> implement.Thanks to your exposition and examples, I can now understand 
> how the small differences actually make a critical difference for your 
> use case; yet, I guess most people can't tell the difference. Making 
> nautilus simpler for a specific case should not make it more complex 
> for the common cases. So creating a solution for this UX problem is 
> probably more complicated than the implementation of the sorting 
> option itself.
I think even under this consideration the gain of complexity seems to be 
a manageable amount, after all it's only a single entry more in like 3 
different places, plus it can be a column not activated by default so 
that only people have to deal with that feature who really need it.
Also I'm pretty convinced it's not so rare that a Linux user has to 
interact and deal with the windows world, no matter if you take now 
document handling or maybe even gaming via wine. I really doubt that I'm 
a rare exception with such a requirement and google is reflecting that :)

> Maybe the "Select Items Matching" feature was implemented with your 
> kind of usage already in mind and it was the solution found at the time.
>
> Then again, this is nothing more than my opinion and speculation

> .
Perhaps, still it's only a workaround in my eyes (and yes, this is only 
my  opinion and speculation).
So, thank you again ;)
~Smirftsch


>
>     On 05.07.2016 21:05, António Fernandes wrote:
>>     Hi Smirftsch,
>>
>>     Did you know about the "Select items matching" feature? It's
>>     keyboard shortcut is 'Ctrl'+'S'. With it you can select all files
>>     with the same extension by typing *.png for instance.
>>
>>     I hope it helps you if/while no sort-by-extension option is
>>     implemented.
>>
>>
>>     António
>>
>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>     escreveu no dia terça, 5/07/2016 às 19:10:
>>
>>         First off, thank you all for developing all this. I know what
>>         time and
>>         effort this all costs and therefor I appreciate any work put
>>         into such a
>>         project like this.
>>
>>         That being said, I want to know if there is a way to enable
>>         "sort by
>>         extension" feature for Nautilus.
>>         If there is already an option for this, I'm sorry for my
>>         elaborationsbelow , but after digging a while I'm pretty
>>         convinced that
>>         I would have found it already if existing.
>>
>>         Now, before starting to harass me with "we don't need another
>>         make Linux
>>         to Windows topic", which seems to be the only obvious reason
>>         for me why
>>         such a programming wise extremely simple feature isn't
>>         implemented yet,
>>         let me explain why and what for this makes sense:
>>         In a perfect Linux world one may be happy with mime type
>>         detection or
>>         type, granted. Reality however is, if people like me, who are
>>         forced to
>>         work in both worlds, a missing feature like this is extremely
>>         work flow
>>         blocking and absolutely annoying. Different filetypes are
>>         mixed because
>>         they are assumed to be the same mime type. If need to copy
>>         out files
>>         from my Windows/Linux cross project, I have mix ups between
>>         .ini, .map
>>         files, between .dll and .so, .ilk and .bsc and and and. I
>>         guess I could
>>         compile a list with dozens of examples. I fully agree that
>>         Linux is not
>>         windows and I don't want the Desktop of my choice to be
>>         "windows'ed",
>>         but such a feature is really an essential addition if one has the
>>         requirement to work with windows files or who needs to have
>>         interactions
>>         between both OS.
>>
>>
>>         Anyway, thanks for your time,
>>         Smirftsch
>>         --
>>         nautilus-list mailing list
>>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
>>
>

-- 
nautilus-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list