Re: Relicensing Nautilus to GPLv3+
Bastien Nocera <[email protected]> Wed, 17 May 2017 17:38:26 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus,gmane.comp.gnome.desktop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 11:13 -0400, Carlos Soriano wrote: > There are few by error. > The important cases are lineup-parameters used for uncrustify, and > the threatics part from gnome-builder. > However, we already spent time on implementing our own thing in the > past with git-archive-all (GPLv3+) when meson couldn't handle it, so > I would like to prevent this from happening again and avoid us the > work with asking few upstreams to relicense based on our needs, and > rather switch to GPL3+ where most of the tools are. I don't understand what git-archive-all has to do with this. Is the problem that some of the tools you ship are GPLv3? That doesn't mean the rest of the module has to be... -- nautilus-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list