Re: Relicensing Nautilus to GPLv3+
Carlos Soriano via desktop-devel-list <[email protected]> Fri, 19 May 2017 04:40:17 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.desktop,gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <fGwsCkH4KuGM1x9H4GExwW4JxVHIcyccuxt9JKFzpXhmYyXQTn9L2Pf6Kf9qRrKjuvk8IjOBQv4mqxpsu_5gqgOJyZvEht1-3TkxkbZLA4o=@protonmail.com> |
Hey A. Walton, Relicensing from gpl2+ (supposed current nautilus) to lgpl2+ (current gtk+) requires agreement of all copyright holders, and the software license is free software one. Relicensing from gpl3+ requires ecxactly the same process, and both are still free software licenses. Do you mean something in particular by "more difficult"? Best regards, Carlos Soriano -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Relicensing Nautilus to GPLv3+ Local Time: May 19, 2017 6:29 AM UTC Time: May 19, 2017 4:29 AM From: [email protected] To: Ernestas Kulik <[email protected]> Gnome Release Team <[email protected]>, nautilus-list <[email protected]>, desktop-devel-list <[email protected]> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Ernestas Kulik <[email protected]> wrote: > (Attempt no. 2, since Geary hates me) > > Hi, > > As the current licensing situation in Nautilus is quite complicated, I > and Carlos are planning a move to relicense the entire codebase to > GPLv3+. > > The codebase has files under several licenses: LGPLv2+, GPLv2+ and > GPLv3+, the latter implicitly making the project be licensed under its > terms, so our options are quite limited here. > > The situation wrt extensions is also not entirely clear, as the > extension library is LGPLv2+ with Nautilus being GPLv2+, which in turn > disallows loading non-free extensions. Given the fact that it is not > meant to be a generic mechanism for loading extensions, I feel like > relicensing it without much consideration is reasonable. > > If there are no objections, we will make the switch in the following > week, most likely. My primary objection is not ideological, but practical - relicensing Nautilus GPLv3+ means that it becomes more difficult to promote code from Nautilus to Gtk+, which has happened a significant number of times in the past and I expect it will continue some into the future. Stacked with the other reasons (plugins, etc), it just doesn't seem like a very good idea. -Andrew Walton. > Regards, > Ernestas > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list -- nautilus-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list