Re: Privacy

Josh Sled <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.apps.gnucash.devel,gmane.comp.gnome.office.general
Organization Asynchronous.org
Message-ID <1079488617.18415.171.camel@phoenix>
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 17:11, Charles Goodwin wrote:

> On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 15:28, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > Yes, this was discussed to death on the gnucash mailing lists. 
> > -- encryption is not enough if your kid can still delete your data files.
> >    The point is really access control, not encryption per se.
> > -- one should stick to OS-provided security mechanisms for many good reasons
> 
> As you imply, this is the job of the OS and not of the application.

That was the argument on gnucash-user.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.apps.gnucash.user/10141 is
probably the best entry-point into the thread, there.

> And besides, if somebody was that concerned about privacy they simply
> would log out when they're finished and keep that user account private
> and give the (presumably) family members their own user accounts.

That -- very reasonably -- doesn't work for a large class of users.  I
hate logging out ... it stops my music, causes me to miss IRC scrollback
buffers, kills my IM client... all sorts of badness.

> Creating yet another user really won't make the accounts more secure. 
> Just more obscurely located.  I thought only MS practiced security
> through obscurity? ;)

Sure it will; as per your previous statement: using the OS ACL
mechanisms is a very valid access-control mechanism, and is the one that
should be respected.

I think the idea is more a "gnome-standard" way to allow the paradigm of
"use a different user for that purpose".

In any case, it looks like there already is:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/xsu/ though I hate it when a project's
homepage goes away, or doesn't exist in the first place. :(

[BTW, there's nothing wrong with security through obscurity ... it just 
 can't be the _only_ security you have.  Otherwise, pile on the 
 obscurity to slow 'em down. ;) ]

...jsled

-- 
http://www.asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo ${a}@${b}`
# A: Because it breaks the flow of normal conversation.
# Q: Why don't we put the response before the request?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.