Re: "dual" files
[email protected] Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:59:30 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.office.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I see and I get your point. Added value would be minimal - especially considering the effort which it would take. Thanks, Rob Am 09.06.2004 um 10:07 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben: > >recently i was thinking about a generic file viewer/reader for > GNOME. > >Eog does this job for images but it would be really cool IMHO > to be > >able to view all kinds of files even though you might not have > the > >actual file-producing application installed. > > > >Two possible approaches came to my mind: > > > >What about including say an svg version within each document > (or do > >it optionally). The XML nature of the gnumeric and abiword file > >format should allow for that pretty easily (in theory at least > :-) > >This way might overlap with the plans for svg based > gnome-office > >embedding. Of course the resulting document files would be a > bit > >"heavier". > > I can say for the AbiWord folks - "no thanks". This is bad for at > least the > following reasons: > > *) Bloats the file format and size > *) Bloats amount of code and complexity of code in the apps > themselves > *) Assumes that the apps can save or print as SVG and capture the > output > (can't be done, but I have some experimental SVG printing support > in > GnomePrint) > *) Multi-page output requires use of the SVGPrint extension to the > SVG 1.2 > standard. I can tell you that nothing under the sun supports SVG > 1.2 or > SVGPrint yet, and such support will likely be a long time coming. > *) XML namespaces and document nesting give me the heebie-jeebies > > I could go on for a while but by now you get my point... > > I should make note that if Gnumeric and Abi start to use a compound > document > format (i.e. JAR), it would be possible to create a "document > thumbnail" > stream or similar within the file, ala PDF. Moving to such a > compound format > won't happen in the near-term future. > > >A second possibility might be to somewhow split out printing > code and > >create a set of "print drivers" for commonly used > file formats > and > >use them within the viewer and the respective application. An > >intermediary solution could be the libegg way of including > sources. > > This is good on paper, until you realize that 80% of an app like > AbiWord's > codebase is required to create such a print driver, in which case > you've > essentially saved your user nothing and caused developers a great > deal of > pain. > > There are a few suggestions that I think are more prudent if you > want to > have a generic "file viewer" application: > > *) The major GO apps export a BonoboControl interface. Make your > application > use a read-only BonoboControl container and embed apps as > necessary. Be a > sport and take over maintainership of the BonoboPrint interface too > while > you're at it and bring it back from the grave. > > *) The major GO apps export (or will soon export) a cmdline printer > > interface. Have the apps print to a PS, PDF, or SVG file. Pipe that > to GGV, > GPDF, RSVG, or whatever suits your fancy. > > Dom > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get fast, reliable Internet access with MSN 9 Dial-up now 3 > months FREE! > http://join.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/