Re: MyBudget for GNOME-office?

Ryan Pavlik <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:46:47 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.office.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[email protected] wrote:

>>>Actually I'd venture that the windows port of python is more mature than
>>>the windows port of gtk.
>>>      
>>>
>>Sure, np with that. But having to distribute python with GO would suck
>>massively imo.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>As a core developer of another GO app I have to agree that doubling the
>size of the required GO package for Divifund does not seem to be worth it.
>On the other hand I think it does provide a useful need. How about a nice
>link to Divifund as an optional extra people might want to download?
>  
>
*cough*associateprojectsonmytestbed*cough*.  Like apache's incubation.

>We could do the same for inkscape.
>
>  
>
There are some who feel quite adamantly that Inkscape does not belong in 
an Office suite, but rather in an "Art" suite.  I contend that visual 
presentation is an office task.

>On the other hand if someone feels like making window's CD's for sale it
>may be worth bundling python+Divifund + inkscape(?) +? insert-favourite-
>GTK-for-windows-app-here?
>  
>
I would agree, the available space on a CD would be a help, and I feel 
this should be pursued.  Especially as I use Windows mostly.

>I guess if we get into the Windows CD business there is a large range of
>nice extra GTK apps people might want to bundle. I'm happy to leave that
>to the people interested in making such CD's.
>
>Cheers
>
>Martin
>
>
>
>  
>
>>But maybe I'm the only one complaining here :)
>>  Marc
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>gnome-office-list mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-office-list
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>gnome-office-list mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-office-list
>
>  
>