Re: Three weeks until gnome-office-1.2, what progress on the website?

Alan Horkan wrote:

>On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 12:14:16 -0500
>>From: Ryan Pavlik <[email protected]>
>>To: [email protected]
>>Cc: [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: Three weeks until gnome-office-1.2,
>>     what progress on the website?
>>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Subject says it all.
>>>
>>>What's happening? Where can I see progress?
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>
>>>Martin
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>gnome-office-list mailing list
>>>[email protected]
>>>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-office-list
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Haven't had much time to hack on it recently, but this is more or less
>>my vision at the moment:
>>http://130.89.227.64/go-www-NEORYAN/
>>
>>It's directly connected to Uwog's CVS Sandbox, to which we have accounts.
>>    
>>
>
>Looks nice.
>
>Not sure I like the WinGO and CoGO, I'd definately favour having one
>single "GO" and then having
>
>GO for GNOME
>GO for Windows
>GO for Mac OS
>
>othewise you split the brand and create even more horrendous acronyms.
>
>- Alan
>
>(offlist because I'm lazy)
>
>
>  
>
You don't really think i'd leave those in, would you?  I made that at 
about 11:30 at night one night, and I just needed filler, because I 
didn't feel like copying my content over.
:)
I agree with your "GO for _____" thought.  Much better to have a nice 
unified brand.

Onlist because I should probably make this clear.

Ryan

-- 
Ryan Pavlik
Open-Source Software Contributor
--
Visual Design and Branding | Packaging | Win32 QA and Porting
--
AbiWord | Divifund | GNOME-Office
--
"Your teacher can open the door, but you must enter by yourself." --Chinese Proverb