Re: Proposed website design

Charles Goodwin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.office.general
Organization XWT Foundation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 20:02, David Bolack wrote:
>   One. The website talk is drowning out some of the technical and we are 
> losing some of the technical folks cause they don't care what shade of blue 
> to use.  I'd like to suggest a separate list be set up, temporarily - or 
> perhaps not so - while the site is devved and just ping here once you hit 
> milestones.

I think a better solution would be for us web-interested folks to grab
an irc channel.  #gnomeoffice on freenode or #office on irc.gimp.org?

That way we can get all the chitter chatter out the way and only present
more relevant notices to the list.

>   Two. We still need to think out how we're presenting the package AND if 
> we're going to want to talk at all about the elated, but not "core Gnome 
> Office" products and how they'll fit into the picture.  I'm not sure how 
> that affects the site design at this point. 

It doesn't really affect the site design.  I would like to see us better
representing Gtk/Gnome Office-related applications but I don't think
that's a primary concern right now.

Our immediate goals:
- overhaul design
- represent core Gnome Office applications
- GO documentation (roadmap etc)

Everything else can be put off until after this.
-- 
- Charlie

The future of the net - www.xwt.org

Charles Goodwin <[email protected]>
  Member of the XWT Foundation
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.