Re: design update
"E. A. Zen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.office.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20040211180116.GA1569@debian> |
On 02/11/04 06:28:25, Calum Benson wrote: > On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 19:52, Charles Goodwin wrote: > > > Red does imply hot/active - bright yellow just looks gross! > > To me, red on a link (whether I'm rolling over it or not) always > implies > "already been there thanks" :) Odd...that's what purple usually means for me. To each their own options/stylesheet/text-files. > > (And black, non-underlined links just seem a poor idea to me to start > with... how are you supposed to tell them apart from regular text > without mousing over everything?) I concur, but I hate the traditional link-appearance on pages, anyways, so, I just go based on general web experience. We can call on "The Prophet" for help if we start to really worry about the average user ; o) -Eric