Re: libgda vs. gnucash [was Re: GnuCash page on GO site]

Rodrigo Moya <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.office.general,gmane.comp.gnome.apps.gnucash.devel,gmane.comp.gnome.db
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 10:40 -0600, Linas Vepstas wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:33:30PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya was heard to remark:
> > who said libmergeant contained all that? Dude, I think you've got no
> > intention at all to share any technology with us. I am just trying to
> > come up with the best way to combine efforts, and all I get from you is
> > that your software is the best.
> 
> This conversation started week ago, when I said "gnucash 
> cannot use gnomedb because it offers the wrong set 
> of database abstractions".  I have no intention of using 
> gnomedb in its current form, because it simply doesn't do 
> the things we need it to do.  It was then asked "why is 
> gnomedb inappropriate for gnucash" and I attempted to explain 
> why.
> 
> If you listened, you would realize that our software is crap. 
> Its got many serious problems.  My flaming is in reaction to 
> the word "share", which, in this chain of letters, seems to 
> mean that I should rip out everything I have and replace 
> it by whatever it is you have, while you lean back and chalk up 
> another one.  
> 
you didn't understand anything :-( I have just looked at the mails in
this thread, and can't find any mention from anyone saying this, so, why
do you get that impression?

> > I am losing time trying to ask you very precise questions about what
> > could be done in order to share technology, and didn't get any answer,
> > just flames back.
> 
> Ahh, and my time is valueless?
>
did I say it is?

>  I have spent three hours a morning
> for a whole week working this email thread.  You didn't ask any 
> precise questions, and I responded with very long replies,
> virtually all of which were ignored.
> 
> > Also, my "it's in mergeant/doc" answer was in asnwer to your question "I
> > couldn't find the libmergeant documentation".
> 
> I still can't find the libmergeant documentation.  Its not there.
> I looked. Its just a user's guide.
> 
> Not Found
> 
>  The requested URL /docs/mergeant/doc/ was not found on this server.
> 
it's not published, I said it was on the mergeant sources, in CVS HEAD.

cheers
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.