Re: [gnome-db] GRAND MASTER PLAN

Dru <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.db,gmane.comp.gnome.apps.gnucash.devel,gmane.comp.gnome.office.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Silvana Di Martino wrote:
> Alle 12:43, domenica 7 marzo 2004, Dru ha scritto:
> Please, allow me to bring some contribution to this thread.
> 
> 
>>Overall vision:
> 
> 
> Should not you know them already, have a look at:
> 
> Rekall, a clone of MS Access (runs on Qt):
> www.totalrekall.co.uk
> www.rekallrevealed.org
> www.thekompany.com
 >
> GNUccess, another clone of MS Access (alpha):
> gnuccess.sourceforge.net
> 
> GNU Enterprise:
> www.gnuenterprise.org
> 
> Mozilla SQL native interface:
> www.mozilla.org
> 
> XULMaker, a Visual GUI builder for Mozilla/XUL:
> www.mozdev.org
> 
> They can be a source of inspiration and, maybe, the people working on these 
> project could be willing to cooperate with you.

I like rekall for what it is but its kde so i excluded it orginally, its 
properly the most mature workable solution out there.  I'm just trying 
to look at gnome here.  gnue i wont go into. Mozilla i never paid enough 
attention because of my shortsigntness in assuming its just a browser 
technology. But i recently did a project in xul.  Its a interesting 
powerful perspective.

>>Reporting
>>Report Designer.
> 
> 
> Have a look at the report designer of Rekall for inspiration.
> 
> I vote for not wasting time in creating a specific Report Designer and Report 
> Engine. Just make your data available to OpenOffice, AbiWord and KOffice and 
> let them do the job. Wordprocessors and Spreadsheets are well-known by 
> end-users and can make a great job on reporting.

If word processes and spreedsheets did a good job of reporting people 
wouldn't be using ms access and crystal reports and whole raft of other 
solutions for doing reporting under windows. word processers only offer 
a limited solution for reports.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.