RE: ORBit2 on uClinux/Coldfire

Jules Colding <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.orbit.general
Organization OMC Denmark ApS
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:10 -0700, Keith Nicewarner wrote:
> I haven’t seen any traffic on this mailing list.  Is anyone still
> using/maintaining ORBit2? 

Yes. A lot of Gnome depends on ORBit2. The low level of traffic must be
due to ORBit2 coming of age. There is not a lot of new development going
on AFAIK, except for the win32 porting effort. Most other changes are
bug fixes/cleanups.

>  I made a little progress cross compiling, but the statically-linked
> executable size for a simple servant is rather large (2 MB).  It
> crashes immediately when I try to run it.  The memory usage for the
> same servant on my host (RH Linux) platform is around 5-6MB and my
> processor only has 8 MB, so I’m worried this may be the problem.  
> 
> What can I do to reduce the executable size and memory footprint?  

Hard to say without the source...

Best regards,
  jules


-- 
Jules Colding
PGP Public Key: 6266E7B7

_______________________________________________
orbit-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-list
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCwPa+GLVOLWJm57cRAuBNAJ0e99tJW1cYcmDPUzVwEfDXkYqO1ACfcgGd
VPaWzZCMEwd3lC1bI5vRYNQ=
=cQ8a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.