Re: some proposed changes

> > 
> > Huw Rogers <[email protected]> writes:
> > > * if a sequence is undef, it is marshalled as a zero length sequence.
> > > Right now if it is not a true reference to an array it dies.
> > 
> > I don't agree with this at all.
> > 
> >  $a = []; print scalar (@$a), "\n";
> >  $a = undef; print scalar (@$a), "\n";
> > 
> > Are very different; the second one is a warning. 
> > 
> > Allowing this would be similar to allowing "undef" to be marshalled as
> > an empty string without any warning, which is similar to thinking
> > in C that "" is the same as NULL. <shudder>
> 
> The sequence marshalling of undef is the most dubious of my proposals,
> and I guess I should retract it.

Having said that,

$a = []; print scalar (@$a), "\n";
$a = undef; print scalar (@$a), "\n";

results in: "0" and "" being printed with no warnings.

$a = []; print int(@$a), "\n";
$a = undef; print int(@$a), "\n";

results in "0" and "0" being printed, again with no warnings.

In general, I'd like things to behave in a Perl like fashion, including
"auto-vivification" of CORBA data structures as necessary.

	-Huw
-- 
Huw Rogers <[email protected]>