Re: I want my old fonts back!

Toralf Lund <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.os.redhat
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> 
> Toralf Lund <[email protected]> writes:
> > I still don't think this is ideal, though. It seems to me that I can
> > use *only* Xft (with our without aliasing, which is good) or *only*
> > non-Xft fonts. Why can't I have both, i.e. all fonts available listed
> > in the selection dialogues?
> >
> 
> It doesn't make sense. Xft vs. non-Xft is NOT two different sets of
> fonts. It's two different font backend libraries that can each display
> any font you want to display.
> 
> If you want the font "FooBar" in Xft, then add "FooBar" to the Xft
> configuration. If you don't want it in Xft, then don't add it.
> 
> Ditto for non-Xft; if you want a font there, then add it.
[ ... ]

Well, I admit I didn't check very carefully how it all works, but then 
again, I don't find a lot of documentation in the packages that would 
explain it.

What I do know, though, is that I get a lot more fonts from xlsfonts, 
xfontsel etc. than what I see in the Xft font selection dialogues, so 
*something* must be wrong with the default setup. Also, I'm a bit weary of 
learning new configuration file formats etc., and I'm a bit concerned 
about what I see as a tendency in the GNOME community for redesigning or 
reimplementing features when it would be more constructive to improve what 
already exists.

- Toralf
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.