Re: I want my old fonts back!
Toralf Lund <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.os.redhat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > Toralf Lund <[email protected]> writes: > > I still don't think this is ideal, though. It seems to me that I can > > use *only* Xft (with our without aliasing, which is good) or *only* > > non-Xft fonts. Why can't I have both, i.e. all fonts available listed > > in the selection dialogues? > > > > It doesn't make sense. Xft vs. non-Xft is NOT two different sets of > fonts. It's two different font backend libraries that can each display > any font you want to display. > > If you want the font "FooBar" in Xft, then add "FooBar" to the Xft > configuration. If you don't want it in Xft, then don't add it. > > Ditto for non-Xft; if you want a font there, then add it. [ ... ] Well, I admit I didn't check very carefully how it all works, but then again, I don't find a lot of documentation in the packages that would explain it. What I do know, though, is that I get a lot more fonts from xlsfonts, xfontsel etc. than what I see in the Xft font selection dialogues, so *something* must be wrong with the default setup. Also, I'm a bit weary of learning new configuration file formats etc., and I'm a bit concerned about what I see as a tendency in the GNOME community for redesigning or reimplementing features when it would be more constructive to improve what already exists. - Toralf