Re: gconfd and multiple machines
seth vidal <[email protected]> 06 May 2003 18:22:35 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.os.redhat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> As I was saying the other day, I don't think "as fast as you can" > is necessary to get a corrupt database. > > The best that writing the files atomically does is give you coherency > between the keys in a single directory. But that isn't enough: > it should be easy, for instance, to get > apps/gnome-terminal/default_profile pointing at a non-existent profile. At which point we're stuck with: 1. people might corrupt their configs or 2. or use the orbit connecting over arbitrary tcpip ports b/t machines that may or may not be able to talk to one another (the afs example) I'm not sure automatic application notification is worth this. -sv