Re: more thoughts on gconfd situation
seth vidal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.os.redhat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1018725324.18850.24.camel@opus> |
On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 10:55, Havoc Pennington wrote: > > seth vidal <[email protected]> writes: > > will gconf-sanity-check-1 fix problems it encounters that are fixable? > > > > At the moment it just tells you how I think ("run rm whatever") > > > *nod* > > > > I'll see about testing if the locking is still unhappy over nfs under > > 2.4.18-somereleasehere. If a crashed out lock can be correctly > > overridden then a lot of the problem I was having will go away. > > The NFS thing is in bugzilla, and not closed yet, IIRC. > It's on the nfs-utils component. > I bounced the bug to the nfs mailing list. Trond was surprised that it doesn't work. I was curious why nfs-utils wasn't 1.0 in skipjack, even. -sv
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8uIPM1Aj3x2mIbMcRAgHYAJ9V7R44ctZEfToUA2in0xviiMdi/wCfWizq e5yDa5Q0EZBVlBDb6uHZDC0= =w1EB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----