Re: Galeon?
seth vidal <[email protected]> 29 May 2003 01:22:59 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.os.redhat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1054185779.4785.33.camel@binkley> |
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 01:05, Havoc Pennington wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 12:42:24AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > is 1.3 that unstable? > > > > I've been using galeon 1.3.4 for a while now with no weirdnesses to > > report. > > > > and it's gtk2 last I looked. > > Right, but we don't want to do a Galeon-1.2 to Galeon-2 transition, > and then a Galeon-2 to Epiphany transition - too much churn - and we > don't want to end up with both Galeon and Epiphany in the distribution > - too much duplication. That makes sense. I'd love to have an all-gtk2 desktop for TNV of gnome and Red Hat, but I understand constraints like that. The biggest obstacle I've had when using epiphany is that the bookmarks are vastly different than I am used to and not so easy to use that I don't need to learn something dramatically different. The bookmarking isn't finished is it? It seems like it has a bit to go before the goals for the bookmarking mechanism are complete. -sv