Re: Building the default desktop
Mark McLoughlin <[email protected]> 28 Jul 2003 10:04:11 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.os.redhat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi George, On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 08:05, George wrote: > This may be mitigated by having two lists for the set of applets/objects. > One which has "default" applets and is never written by the panel and one > which has the current set of applets. (then you'd also need a way to mark > some of the ones from the "default" set to be deleted, perhaps a third > list). This way the sysadmin could maintain the default list of > applets/objects and the user could add/remove their applets/objects > and changes to the default set would still be picked up. > > I think this would be a very useful thing as part of the whole lockdown > framework. If you'd lock the "removed defaults" list then you'd disallow > removing of default applets. > > Same could be done for panels. Mark, any thoughts on this? (Obviously this > is post 2.4 :) Hmm, I think the panel setup is complicated enough as it is :-) I'm starting to get some mad notions that having all this in GConf doesn't really make sense. Why aren't panel's basically just folder views (like the desktop) showing you a representation of what's in the folder. Positions would be stored in the file metadata, you lock the panel by making the directory non writable etc. This totally doesn't answer the question of how a sysadmin can add extra things to an existing users panel but it does make it the same question as how to add extra stuff to an existing user's desktop :-) Good Luck, Mark.