Re: 7.3 gnomehide updated
Per Kreuger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.os.redhat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Havoc Pennington wrote: > Per Kreuger <[email protected]> writes: > >>Has anyone got the capplets in the version of sawfish distributed with >>the hide to work with the new contol-center or libcapplet0? > > > This is screwed up, the problem is that we need not only the capplet > compat lib but also the old control center binary - which I think > conflicts with the new one. I'm not sure yet what I'm going to do > about that. Maybe it's simple to deal with. > Running sawfish config without capplet support seems to have been an option but barfs in the current build. I'll have a look if I can get this to work again. That would avoid the problem until a version of Sawfish supporting the new control-center surfaces. The 2.0-pre1 in the latest garnome seems to work. >>Also, the fonts in gnome2 based applications and on the desktop >>appears _HUGE_. The only (somewhat) usable fonts are the 8 point >>condenced ones. This is rather annoying. >> >>My Xserver has a resoloution of about 124 dp (1540*1024 laptop >>screen). I can get smaller fonts by explicitly specifying a lower dpi >>in the Xserver but this seems like kludge... > > > The idea is that a "10 point" font should come out about the same > physical size on all displays. The rules for this may need a bit of > tweaking. (1540x1024 laptop isn't the most common kind of display ;-) > Well, I guess a 1540x1024 laptop isn't exactly standard but 124 dpi can be _that_ unusal. In addition the version of gnome-terminal skipped with the hide has weird notions about the size if the glyphs in the standard fonts (e.g. fixed and courier) that makes a 24 by 80 terminal in 10 point wider than the screen. Quite unusable... You mention that the rules might have to tweeked. Could I do that myself? Any pointers? piak