Re: 7.3 gnomehide updated

Per Kreuger <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.os.redhat
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Per Kreuger <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>>Has anyone got the capplets in the version of sawfish distributed with
>>the hide to work with the new contol-center or libcapplet0?
> 
> 
> This is screwed up, the problem is that we need not only the capplet
> compat lib but also the old control center binary - which I think
> conflicts with the new one. I'm not sure yet what I'm going to do
> about that. Maybe it's simple to deal with.
>  

Running sawfish config without capplet support seems to have been an 
option but barfs in the current build. I'll have a look if I can get 
this to work again. That would avoid the problem until a version of 
Sawfish supporting the new control-center surfaces. The 2.0-pre1 in the 
latest garnome seems to work.

>>Also, the fonts in gnome2 based applications and on the desktop
>>appears _HUGE_. The only (somewhat) usable fonts are the 8 point
>>condenced ones. This is rather annoying.
>>
>>My Xserver has a resoloution of about 124 dp (1540*1024 laptop
>>screen). I can get smaller fonts by explicitly specifying a lower dpi
>>in the Xserver but this seems like kludge...
> 
> 
> The idea is that a "10 point" font should come out about the same
> physical size on all displays. The rules for this may need a bit of 
> tweaking. (1540x1024 laptop isn't the most common kind of display ;-)
>

Well, I guess a 1540x1024 laptop isn't exactly standard but 124 dpi can 
be _that_ unusal. In addition the version of gnome-terminal skipped with 
the hide has weird notions about the size if the glyphs in the standard 
fonts (e.g. fixed and courier) that makes a 24 by 80 terminal in 10 
point wider than the screen. Quite unusable...

You mention that the rules might have to tweeked. Could I do that 
myself? Any pointers?

	piak
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.