Re: Gnome-packaging-list digest, Vol 1 #115 - 3 msgs
"Michael A. Peters" <[email protected]> Tue, 09 Dec 2003 17:21:39 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.packaging |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 15:41, James Richardson wrote: > > > 1) Defining directories in the spec-file sucks. > I agreed, I was using the referenced site as a "guideline" not as a > howto.... no sense in rewritting binddir=blah when you don't have to... > however i've noticed there's a lot of inconsitity in the destination of > man pages.... sometimes they end up in /usr/man others /usr/share/man, > but that's not really a big deal i guess. If the package has a proper configure script - the %configure macro will put man pages in the system default location. Gnome packages that do not have a configure switch for where man pages go should have a patch written for the autoconf system and submitted to the package maintainer.