RE: outstanding patches

So, I won't have a chance until next week to commit these patches, but I
guess that anybody who has write access should
go ahead and commit them (always adding a ChangeLog entry if the patch
failed to do that):
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119982
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120910
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120954


Chema, do you want to delegate some simple patch approval to me. For
instance, I would approve these patches:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122738
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120651
  (after branching)
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117840
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117193
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109460
  (after branching)

( from http://makeashorterlink.com/?T1D023CF5 )

Murray Cumming
[email protected]
www.murrayc.com 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chema Celorio [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Freitag, 19. September 2003 16:15
> To: Murray Cumming
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: outstanding patches
> 
> 
> Sure Murray,
> 
> I have just approved 119982, 120910 added a comment to 120651 and
> 107687.
> 
> 120954 has a patch and a "feel free to apply" comment, I am unsure if
> Owen has applied it already. There are other bugs filed with patches
> that seem to not be generally correct.
> 
> regards,
> Chema
> 
> On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 04:38, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > libgnomeprint* seems to be a little neglected recently? Is 
> that likely to get
> > better soon? Would the maintainers like to delegate a 
> little authority to me
> > to commit simple patches, though I am only now becoming 
> familiar with
> > libgnomeprint*? We also need to branch now that 2.4 is out.
> > 
> > 
> > Murray Cumming
> > [email protected]
> > www.murrayc.com
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-print-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-print-list
> > 
> 
>