Re: [patch] Rework of Pango integration

Owen Taylor <[email protected]> Wed, 09 Jun 2004 12:48:14 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.gnome.print
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 12:19, Jody Goldberg wrote:

> That is not the core of the problem.  Portions of the related
> layouts remain behind.  We're seeing things like :
> 
> MLK: 192 bytes leaked in 6 blocks
>   * This memory was allocated from:
> 	malloc         [rtlib.o pc=0x6a3c8]
> 	g_malloc       [gmem.c:136 pc=0xf9e56888]
> 	pango_ft2_font_render_glyph [pangoft2.c:314 pc=0xfb03afb8]
> 	pango_ft2_render [pangoft2.c:384 pc=0xfb03b45c]
> 	pango_ft2_render_layout_line [pangoft2.c:790 pc=0xfb03c3ac]
> 	pango_ft2_render_layout [pangoft2.c:884 pc=0xfb03ca98]
> 
> Even when the layout has been unrefed.  If it was just the global
> singleton this would be less significant.

This is just caching... it should be reachable from the fontmap,
right?

						Owen

_______________________________________________
gnome-print-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-print-list

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAxz9OS+2LB0B90LERAuq9AKC9Ubgo+X1IBLOyAO8i7pXWahp8KgCgoukh
lKDx63NcpSnjegRBsKElJpY=
=Mh7C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----