Re: libgnomeprint cups backend vs libgnomecups
Colin Walters <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:47:16 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.print |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 14:28, Danek Duvall wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 02:06:42PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > Colin and I have been busy hacking the cups module in libgnomeprint to > > make it use libgnomecups, which allows us to display and update printer > > state information in the print dialog. > > So I'm not completely up on the complete printing architecture of GNOME, so > this may be a stupid question, but why have both libgnomeprint and > libgnomecups? What purpose does it serve to abstract the CUPS API, and > just the CUPS API, in a library? Two reasons: 1) It's a more GNOME-y API, using GObject, etc. 2) It implements polling. > Would those abstractions or enhancements > be better off in the CUPS API itself? The polling could go into the CUPS API in theory. But it'd be trickier because CUPS can't directly use the glib mainloop, etc. _______________________________________________ gnome-print-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-print-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBA0zizOIkJWWp2WGURAsuBAJ99UoTqHwY2xvjGcKslTOAcDT21bQCeN+RQ kMB096KY+nv+4/Ma/trci+c= =0XmV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----