Re: Grand Unified Printing

On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 23:04 -0400, Bryan Clark wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 12:03 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > The general thought seemed to be that we should create a new CVS module.
> > I half-jokingly suggested calling it gup, for Grand Unified Printing,
> > but people seemed to like it.  However the gup is also the abbreviation
> > for the GNOME Usability Project, but they don't have a CVS module.  Do
> > we care about this?
> 
> I think the real question is 'do you care about usability?' ;-) And I
> guess a secondary question is 'Is the Usability Team going to use the
> gup module for anything?'  The answer to that one is most likely a no,
> we have space under the /gnome.org/projects area and I can't imagine us
> needing more.

The question is, are we so impoverished for names we need to reuse this
one? Is 'gup' really a good name for a printing module? Shouldn't we
use something mildly descriptive like gnome-printing-tools,
gnome-print-utils, etc?

Regards,
						Owen

_______________________________________________
gnome-print-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-print-list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBfWPuS+2LB0B90LERAvMwAKCqT3g1l8LbWA30B3t1qPNgr/zb5ACg1gT9
18LjttsZ00exa/koX9cJUHQ=
=K+SB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----