Re: eggcups (and libgnomecups) for 2.12

> > Why wouldn't one have a local cupsd?
> 
> Good question. We have local cups daemons. Since the whole asynchronous
> stuff apparently got included to avoid delays when talking with a
> non-responsive remote cups daemon, I assume there are some people
> somewhere that are trying to avoid having a local cups daemon.

No, the async stuff is necessary even for local cupsd, since the local
cupsd can get stuck for noticeable amounts of time while talking to 
remote servers...

Matthias