Re: scaled icons
"Matthias Clasen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.themes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/9/06, Rodney Dawes <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 13:01 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 18:31 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > > Il giorno mar, 09/05/2006 alle 10.34 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto: > > > > > > > > > > > > only 28 were scaled. If you look at the attached list, you see > > > > that most of them fall into 2 categories: > > > > > > > > - gtk stock icons which are used in buttons, thus are loaded in > > > > size 20, but are only available in size 24 > > > > > > So, could we switch GTK+ to use 16 pixels icons for buttons? > > > > > > I'm using this behavior via .gtkrc and it's not so bad. > > > > > > > How about simply adding the missing icons instead ? > > > > 20 is already small, and it is not going to get better with increasing > > screen solutions. > > Because it's already bad enough that we have to draw them in 16 and 22 > sizes. Any reason to not make the buttons use 22 or 24 instead, to match > the toolbar size? It's hard enough drying the icons at these small > sizes. Having to redraw the icons with 2 square pixels of difference so > many times is just not worth the time. > You can just scale them down, thats happening at runtime anyway....