Re: [Usability] Modified Documents
markus hammer <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:23:30 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.ui-hackers |
|---|---|
| Organization | sabotage communications |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 09:09 -0400, Boris Goldowsky wrote: > On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 12:09 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: > > > Your comments make me think that the Status bar would be a more > > approrpriate place to put an Icon indicating Read Only status. > > Why not adopt the NeXT & Mac OS X practice of putting a mark inside or > over the 'close window' control? It makes sense because if you are > about to close a document window, that's the moment you need to be > reminded that it has been modified. all that comes to my mind is eye candy. i ask myself if benign applications would even let you close the program without popping up a dialog: "The document you are working on has been modified, do you want to save it before closing the application ?" - or similar, or even let you do any changes inside the document when its read only. all this stuff belongs on the application side of the system, and absolutely not into the window manager. what sure is good - to have a clear statement if a file is (read-only) or (modified), no cryptic letters or even icons. if someone is using small window bars due to small screen resolution - thinking of putting an icon there is the same failure as using a cryptic * sign. as both may end up being similar in size. m hammer