Re: GNOME 3 Usability Hackfest

Charline <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.usability
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Brian,

What we will be presenting at the Hackfest.

The context:
I am about to start an experimental co-design research on 
"developer-centered communication" of usability results.  What it means 
concretely is that, following some usability research on Empathy with 
end users, I will be observing how developers use usability report and 
where are the pitfalls of this communication.  Then, we will 
collaboratively begin a reflection on how to redesign the presentation 
of this material to fit this group of developers' interest, work 
processes and needs. 

The session: 
I hope that some of the developers will join us for our session at 
Canonical.  We will present the usability findings and brainstorm with 
the group new structures for reporting on usability in the specific 
contexts of the usability practitioner's and the developer's work.

The outcome:
A clearer understanding of developers' needs and context of work and of 
how 'developer-centric reporting' could foster usability adoption.  We 
might even create a rough or maybe not so rough outline of a possible 
reporting mechanism.

It would be great if others could also bring some of their reports or 
findings and we could see how those could also be communicated.  It 
would certainly make our outcome more robust.

See you in London!

C.




Brian Cameron wrote:
>
> After doing some research, I have gotten some lodging recommendations
> for the hackfest and you can find details on the GNOME 3 Usability
> Wiki:
>
>   http://live.gnome.org/UsabilityProject/London2010
>
> The Wiki still needs some love, though.  It would be nice if people
> could add more useful information.  For example, it would be nice if
> we could find a volunteer to develop a logo or banner image for the
> event and Wiki page.  Considering the number of graphic design
> artists on this list, I'd think it should be easy to find someone to
> help.
>
> Looking at the Wiki, there are now 12 people who have signed up to
> attend, so it is looking like it will be a good sized event.  I also
> know there are a few other people who likely will attend who haven't
> yet added their name, so there may be as many as 20 people.
>
> I have pinged the travel committee and nobody has yet sent in a travel
> subsidy form for this event.  If you are needing assistance with travel
> costs, please submit a form sooner than later so that the GNOME Travel
> Committee can work out the costs.
>
> I am a little disappointed that there has not been more discussion on
> this list to plan for the event.  I think the Wiki does a good job of
> highlighting the various things that the GNOME Usability team can
> focus on during the hackfest, but many of them would benefit from some
> discussion and preparation.  With GNOME 3.0 coming and a weeks worth
> of time to spend together, I would think there should be more to
> discuss.
>
> I would appreciate it if everybody who is planning on attending the
> GNOME 3 Usability Hackfest could speak up and share their ideas of what
> we should focus on while together, and what things each person plans to
> bring to the event or work on.
>
> Perhaps this could evolve into an agenda.  Rather than spending the
> first day of the event brainstorming and putting sticky notes on a
> whiteboard, perhaps we could work this out beforehand and use our
> face-to-face time more wisely.
>
> Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Usability mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability


-- 

*CHARLINE POIRIER*
*User Research Programme Lead*
*Canonical*
*27th floor, 21-24 Millbank Tower*
*London SW1P 4QP UK *

*Tel: +44 (0) 20 7630 2491*
*Mob: +44 (0) 78 8695 4514*
*www.Ubuntu.com <http://www.Ubuntu.com/> <http://www.Ubuntu.com/>*
*www.Canonical.com <http://www.Canonical.com/>*
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.