Re: Zoom Controls
Calum Benson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.usability |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 29 Apr 2010, at 13:24, Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > > IIRC the reason why we chose not to have a percentage in Epiphany is > that it doesn't mean anything. For a word processor, you can still claim > that 100% is a zoom factor more-or-less equal to the actual size when > printed on paper. For a webpage, it's just undefined. Well, presumably it's defined as something like 'using the font sizes defined in my preferences, and the image sizes defined by the web page'. But I agree that '100%' probably isn't the best way to represent that. Cheeri, Calum. -- CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer Oracle Corporation, Ireland mailto:[email protected] Solaris Desktop Team http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Oracle Corp.