Re: Deja Dup UI Review

Calum Benson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.usability
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 17 May 2010, at 15:34, Diego Moya wrote:

> Use cases can help a lot both when creating and evaluating a design.
> The usability expert is supposed to know as much as possible of the
> application context while performing the heuristic evaulation.
> 
> Wikipedia explains it better than me:
> "Often the heuristic evaluation is conducted in the context of use
> cases (typical user tasks), to provide feedback  to the developers on
> the extent to which the interface is likely to be compatible with the
> intended users’ needs and preferences."
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic_evaluation

It's all mostly-irrelevant and off-topic semantics, but I'd somewhat disagree with Wikipedia :) In usability circles, a review conducted by usability experts following certain use cases would more commonly be called an "expert review".  

A classic "heuristic review" is purely systematic, taking the design one screen at a time, and running through a checklist of design principles (such as Nielsen's famous ten[1]) for each one, largely ignoring actual usage.  

Of course, in practice, most reviews tend to end up being a mixture of both techniques anyway -- even if you're doing a strictly-heuristic review, it's hard to completely detach yourself from an intended user's perspective unless you share literally none of their domain knowledge.

Cheeri,
Calum.

[1] <http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.html>

-- 
CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer     Oracle Corporation, Ireland
mailto:[email protected]         Solaris Desktop Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum             +353 1 819 9771

Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Oracle Corp.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.