Re: Compliance to GNOME UI Patterns of Cross-Platform Apps

Andreas Nilsson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.usability
Message-ID <[email protected]>
  On 09/01/2010 09:12 AM, DmD Ljungmark wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 15:06 +0800, Allan Caeg wrote:
>> Mozilla is coming up with a new Add-ons Manager UI for Firefox. I was
>> asked
>> what Linux-specific stuff should be designed and how much should be
>> specified, because the look and feel depends on the DE's settings. I
>> said
>> that all I can think of at that time is that it should follow the GTK+
>> "skinning" of XUL like how other XUL elements do it, because the
>> Add-ons
>> Manager doesn't yet (in Firefox 4.0 Beta 4).
>>
>>
> Hi, I'm wondering about the two-gear button, in the upper right next to
> the Search interface.  It doesn't look like any other button around it
> has rounded corners, icons not aligned to the borders of the button,
> different horizontal height compared to the search field.
Working on that.
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=584006#c14
> The main list "Name" and "Last Updated" should probably be a "real" list
> (compare to a mail client/file manager) to indicate sorting, with the
> arrow up/down for sorting rather than shading the background.
Hm, maybe. Can you add a comment about to 
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590175 ?

> What significance does the left/right arrow in the upper-ish left part
> have?   They _seem_ to control the tab you have active, but does it do
> something else?   Why doesn't the ui use the same back/Forward buttons
> of the main browser?
The browser navigation toolbar is going away for the addons tab, because 
search box, url bar etc. don't make sense for it. See 
http://jboriss.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/add-ons-manager-ui-update/

Could you add the other comments to #590175 too? This list is probably 
the wrong forum to get these fixed.
- Andreas
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.