Re: Tab Glow States
Felipe Erias Morandeira <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:32:23 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.usability |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 16/09/10 09:34, Thorsten Wilms wrote: > Looking at what synchronous and asynchronous usually mean regarding > communication, I consider this choice of term troublesome. What exactly > is synchronous about a notification that can be left sitting there all > day? The problem that I see with having different states according to urgency is that urgency and importance of the notification are subjective. Just as an example, I don't want to be notified of most emails but some are extremely important for me and would like to be able to act on them as soon as possible. > I think animations should be avoided for the first case. Too high risk > of being annoying for things that are not important enough. Could it be that pulsing tabs have the risk of becoming the new <blink> tag, and therefore animations should be avoided completely? Felipe