Re: g_file_hash parameter

Alexander Larsson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.vfs.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 23:20 +0200, Marko Anastasov wrote:
> Hi,
> A minor note/question:
> I noticed that GFile interface defines the hash function
> to take a GFile* as a parameter (as usual), but g_file_hash()
> takes a gconstpointer? For easier wrapping, could it be GFile*?

Hmmm. It is gconstpointer so that apps don't have to cast it when
passing it to g_hash_table_new, which is what most users will do. At
least in C. How big a problem is this for bindings? Its similar to what
e.g. g_str_hash does.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.