Re: bump hal req to 0.5.10? (Was Re: Releases: gvfs 0.1.0, eel & nautlus 2.21.1)

"Elijah Newren" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.vfs.general,gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Dec 21, 2007 4:18 PM, David Zeuthen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 12:51 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> > Do we need a newer hal? The one shipped with jhbuild (and official
> > external dep) is 0.5.9.
>
> Right, gvfs uses some new client-side API in libhal that uses a hash
> table so property lookup is O(1) instead of O(n).
>
> Since 0.5.10 was released Oct. 11 2007 and GNOME 2.22 is scheduled for
> sometime in 2008 I think we probably just want to bump the requirement
> to be hal 0.5.10. Most distros shipping 2.20 ship hal 0.5.10; everyone
> else, I think, has it in their development trees.

Sounds good to me.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.