Bad certificate example in 3.2 release notes

Hi,

Maybe this has already been noticed, but while reading the release notes 
on 3.2 I stumbled across a picture of an example certificate. The 
certificate reads 'DigiNotar'. Now this certificate company has had bad 
publicity concerning certificates having been cracked by 'a less 
reputable' government. The company was subsequently dumped by th Dutch 
government who used the DigiNotar certificates. The company is now 
bankrupt. Maybe it would be wise not to use this certificate as an 
example concerning security matters in Linux and Gnome.

Kind regards,

Marten Kramer
The Netherlands