Re: proposed addition to EWMH: _NET_WM_NORMAL_GEOMETRY

Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.wm-spec
Organization You expect me to be organized?
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:05:19 -0700 "Mark Tiefenbruck" <[email protected]>
babbled:

> > i disagree with the ordering - -geometry is the way it is because of parsing
> > ans spacing - this is a command-lin e argument. different from PROPERITES.
> > all other netwm PROPERTIES are X,Y,WIDTH,HEIGHT - which is actually the
> > most common order you see such geometry in API calls for creating and
> > moving/resizing windows, drawing boxes etc. etc. i see no good reason to
> > re-order the arguments in a property based on the ordering in just 1
> > command-line argument.
> 
> Fair enough. It was a rather arbitrary decision, anyway. I figured
> there might be circumstances where size would be provided but not
> coordinates. On the other hand, maybe just the opposite will occur
> with future _NET_WM_STATE properties. I don't think there's a natural
> way to allow for these with just one window property, anyway.
> 
> Any other problems?

not really - we already do this for e17 - but we have our own specific
properties we use to allow the wm to pass on state between restarts - haven't
made any attempt to pass it onto other wm's or make it stable/well defined
though.


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [email protected]
裸好多
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)
_______________________________________________
wm-spec-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.