Re: [EWMH] _NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE_AUXILIARY

Tuomo Valkonen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.wm-spec
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2007-10-19, Russell Shaw <[email protected]> wrote:
> One advantage of unicode encoding is that every character has the
> same meaning independant of any tag things. That makes it easy to
> cut and paste multilingual text between applications without any
> out-of-band communication of encoding tags. This statelessness
> is the most worthwhile advantage IMO. UTF-8 could be considered
> a common inter-app encoding protocol, and apps can use whatever
> encoding they want internally.

That's up to for individual protocols to specify, or (preferrably)
not specify. A single protocol is in any case easier to ugprade to
a better encoding than a global monoculture. Applications hardly 
can use whatever encoding they want to use internally if libraries
force a monoculture. The best approach is abstraction, an encoding
blackbox, but such a fundamental tenet of good software design
tends to not be appreciated these days, because any possibility for
alternatives is a big no-no. Megalomaniac rigid and bureaucratic
structures are in.

-- 
Tuomo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.