Re: [EWMH] _NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE_AUXILIARY
Tuomo Valkonen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.wm-spec |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2007-10-19, Russell Shaw <[email protected]> wrote: > One advantage of unicode encoding is that every character has the > same meaning independant of any tag things. That makes it easy to > cut and paste multilingual text between applications without any > out-of-band communication of encoding tags. This statelessness > is the most worthwhile advantage IMO. UTF-8 could be considered > a common inter-app encoding protocol, and apps can use whatever > encoding they want internally. That's up to for individual protocols to specify, or (preferrably) not specify. A single protocol is in any case easier to ugprade to a better encoding than a global monoculture. Applications hardly can use whatever encoding they want to use internally if libraries force a monoculture. The best approach is abstraction, an encoding blackbox, but such a fundamental tenet of good software design tends to not be appreciated these days, because any possibility for alternatives is a big no-no. Megalomaniac rigid and bureaucratic structures are in. -- Tuomo