Re: Re: Re: Pager and Desktop Layout
Ryan Beasley <[email protected]> Wed, 3 Aug 2011 19:43:30 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.wm-spec |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALeYXr9e+DvVqsA3F5f1gSdPM9t_2fyBq-Te2QiQvPLfNhRCUA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Martin Gräßlin <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah I understand. In that case I think it would be best to not have a desktop shell in the guest > system, but to have the guest windows really connecting to the host X Server. And I think it > should not matter so much for the desktop shell in the guest system how the desktop layout > looks like in the outer world. Unfortunately it's a lot more complicated than that. :) For example, a host running Windows or Mac OS X may not have an X server. Legacy desktop shell in the guest manages windows, mapping and unmapping depending on the current virtual desktop, so the guest layout must be in sync with the host. I could go on _forever_. > But for that use case the KWin internal changes should not matter. It will be as "broken" as > before. You're specifically talking about needing the _NET_DESKTOP_LAYOUT_Sn selection, right? As opposed to just responding to updates to the _NET_DESKTOP_LAYOUT property? TIA - Ryan