Re: problem with SoupContexts
Joe Shaw <[email protected]> 03 Sep 2002 22:52:51 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.ximian.soup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1031107970.2496.22.camel@cowtown> |
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 19:24, Alex Graveley wrote: > I hesitate to take a patch like this, since I think the current behavior > is correct... also netscape and mozilla do the same thing. Can you just > access the second uri as a different user? What harm is there in > sending the most recent auth if no username is specified? If I understand correctly, the problem is that if you *do* send it as a different user, it doesn't use that second user, since the cache isn't at all keyed with the user. At least, that's what Diego's example illustrates: On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 14:46, Diego González wrote: > https://user-p1:p1@localhost:63000/ > https://user-p2:p1@localhost:63000/ I think you're right, though, in that it would probably be fine to just cache the username. Joe _______________________________________________ Soup-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/soup-list