Re: problem with SoupContexts

Joe Shaw <[email protected]> 03 Sep 2002 22:52:51 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.ximian.soup
Message-ID <1031107970.2496.22.camel@cowtown>
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 19:24, Alex Graveley wrote:
> I hesitate to take a patch like this, since I think the current behavior
> is correct... also netscape and mozilla do the same thing.  Can you just
> access the second uri as a different user?  What harm is there in
> sending the most recent auth if no username is specified?

If I understand correctly, the problem is that if you *do* send it as a
different user, it doesn't use that second user, since the cache isn't
at all keyed with the user.  At least, that's what Diego's example
illustrates:

On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 14:46, Diego González wrote:
> https://user-p1:p1@localhost:63000/
> https://user-p2:p1@localhost:63000/

I think you're right, though, in that it would probably be fine to just
cache the username.

Joe

_______________________________________________
Soup-list maillist  -  [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/soup-list