Re: Does Anyone Compile Aspell with -DNDEBUG?
Kevin Atkinson <[email protected]> Sun, 1 Jun 2008 05:06:36 -0600 (MDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.aspell.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Kevin Atkinson wrote: >> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> >>> Kevin Atkinson wrote: >>>> >>>> If so stop. Most asserts perform important safety checks and disabling >>>> them could lead to data corruption and other nasty things. Also, they >>>> should have a negligible effect on performance. >>> >>> I'm not sure if this is correct, STL checks could be expensive even when >>> optimizing the code. >> >> Can you please show me proof of this. > > It is just a impression because I've never heard about such a strategy to > ensure correctness. I only know, in debug mode msvc-stl-code is several > times slower than in release mode, due to disabling optimizations and > executing additional checks. > But a proof would only be a aspell benchmark which I don't have. Debug mode should be the same thing as compiling without defining NDEBUG. _______________________________________________ Aspell-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aspell-devel