Aspell Dictionaries for 64-bit Windows

--===============1776598635461057693==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005016e805707ce354"

--0000000000005016e805707ce354
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi,
This link warns not to use Aspell dictionaries on 64-bit systems unless
properly compiled
with --enable-32-bit-hash-fun option.

http://aspell.net/man-html/Using-32_002dBit-Dictionaries-on-a-64_002dBit-System.html

My question is regarding the dictionaries from here:

ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/en

1. Should this option be used for the most recent English dictionaries?

2. If to build the dictionaries at a big endian Intel/AMD x86_64 Linux,
should they be appropriate
to use at a big endian win64 Windows?

Thank you in advance.

Hypo

--0000000000005016e805707ce354
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hi,</div><div>This link warns not to use Aspell dicti=
onaries on 64-bit systems unless properly compiled</div><div>with=20
--enable-32-bit-hash-fun

option.</div><div><br></div><div>
<span class=3D"gmail-gI"><span><a href=3D"http://aspell.net/man-html/Using-=
32_002dBit-Dictionaries-on-a-64_002dBit-System.html">http://aspell.net/man-=
html/Using-32_002dBit-Dictionaries-on-a-64_002dBit-System.html</a></span></=
span></div><div><span class=3D"gmail-gI"><span><br></span></span></div><div=
><span class=3D"gmail-gI"><span>My question is regarding the dictionaries f=
rom here:</span></span></div><div><span class=3D"gmail-gI"><span><br></span=
></span></div><div><span class=3D"gmail-gI"><span><a href=3D"ftp://ftp.gnu.=
org/gnu/aspell/dict/en">ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/en</a><br></span>=
</span></div><div><span class=3D"gmail-gI"><span><br></span></span></div><d=
iv><span class=3D"gmail-gI"><span>1. Should this option be used for the mos=
t recent English dictionaries?</span></span></div><div><span class=3D"gmail=
-gI"><span><br></span></span></div><div><span class=3D"gmail-gI"><span>2. I=
f to build the dictionaries at a big endian Intel/AMD x86_64 Linux, should =
they be appropriate</span></span></div><div><span class=3D"gmail-gI"><span>=
to use at a=20
<span class=3D"gmail-gI"><span>big endian win64 Windows?</span></span></spa=
n></span></div><div><span class=3D"gmail-gI"><span><span class=3D"gmail-gI"=
><span><br></span></span></span></span></div><div><span class=3D"gmail-gI">=
<span><span class=3D"gmail-gI"><span>Thank you in advance.</span></span></s=
pan></span></div><div><span class=3D"gmail-gI"><span><span class=3D"gmail-g=
I"><span><br></span></span></span></span></div><div><span class=3D"gmail-gI=
"><span><span class=3D"gmail-gI"><span>Hypo</span></span></span></span><br>=
</div></div>

--0000000000005016e805707ce354--


--===============1776598635461057693==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Aspell-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aspell-devel

--===============1776598635461057693==--