Re: The String class for 0.60 does not null terminate strings.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin Atkinson" <[email protected]>
To: "Gary Setter" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [aspell-devel] The String class for 0.60 does not
null terminate strings.


> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Gary Setter wrote:
>
> > > On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, Gary Setter wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm doing a Win32 port. I just got it to compile and I'm
seeing
> > > > how things work. Right away I see that the String class
does not
> > > > null terminate.
> > >
> > > Can you be more specific.  The String class does not always
null terminate
> > > but it does when needed.
> >
> > The version that I downloaded has a write date of 24-Jun-04
> > 11:07pm
> >
> > The c'tor from a const char * is
> >
> >     String(const char * s) {assign_only(s);}
> >
> > assign only is
> >     void assign_only(const char * b)
> >     {
> >       if (b && *b) assign_only_nonnull(b, strlen(b));
> >       else zero();
> >     }
> ...
> > You will call assign_only_nonnull with b= "a\0" and size = 1.
The
> > memmove will only copy one character ( the 'a' )  to
begin_[0],
> > begin_[1] is not initialized.
> > That is just one example.
> > Do you want to see my rendition?
>
> That is correct.  The string is not guaranteed to be null
terminated.  This
> is for performance reasons as is not always needed.  This is
most apparent
> when appending one character at a time.  The string is only
null
> terminated when c_Star() is called or ensure_null_end() is
called.
> Otherwise it leaves room for the null end but doesn't null
terminate the
> string.  This is a design design on my part which I will not
change with
> out a very good reason.
>
> Fell free to submit a patch which adds some documentation on
the behavior
> of the String class.
>
Hi Kevin,

I showed all the methods that are used when constructing a String
object for a c string literal. One of those methods should have
null terminated the string that begin_ points to. None did. If
I'm wrong please show we where a String object constructed from a
const char * is null terminated.

I await you reply with keen interest.
Gary