Re: MSYS patch

"Gary Setter" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.aspell.devel
Message-ID <000001c50d47$9a2e6ca0$52144a0c@pavilion>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin Atkinson" <[email protected]>
To: "Gary Setter" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: [aspell-devel] MSYS patch


> On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Gary Setter wrote:
>
> > Whould you consider saving the the handle of the aspell lib
at
> > the time you do your LoadLibrary and define
get_module_handle()
> > to return that handle?
>
> Please submit a patch.
>
My plan was to submit that patch at the time each exported
function was marked with the ASPELL_API macro. I could submit
that in the next day or two, but until the c interface is
complete, the marking of exported functions will be incomplete.

> > What types of things are you exporting from your version of
the
> > dll? The 0.5 version exported a lot of class methods and
whole
> > classes.
>
> They are needed for the Aspell utility only.  No other program
should be
> using them.
>
That is interesting. I consider the utility a good test for
wether the api is complete.

> > I thought the project was moving in the direction of a c
> > only interface. Are we there yet?
>
> No.  Its is getting closer.
>
 Release early, release often?

What about the generated files? I can visualize aspell.h being
generated based on the ASPELL_API macro, but I still don't
understand how something like check_info.hpp is generated.
I just searched all the files distributed with the last alpha,
and CheckInfo only shows up in check_info.hpp. Are all the
"Automatically generated file." comments up to date?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.