Re: Testing notification code in speller_impl.cpp

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Gary Setter wrote:

> Hi,
> I wrote yesterday that one of my hang ups with win32 patches was
> the arrary of UpdateMember with an initalization expression. The
> Aspell 0.5 code was not very presentable. I asked for ideas, but
> nothing came in.
> 
> I made my own attempt. Rather then storing a function pointer, I
> made an enum for each notification function and a call function
> that calls the right one.

I don't like that solution at all.  For one thing it makes it diffacult to 
add new notifiers in the future.

I think it is better to assign to the array in a helper function that is 
called exactly once.

If you want you can post both solutions so I can decide which solution is  
better, if any.

--- 
http://kevin.atkinson.dhs.org