RE: An idea for a 1.0 release built around ivrscript

Putting classic for a later date would actually be a good idea. As that way
we can have a stable core against which the classic plugin can be tested
more thoroughly. Also this would ensure that those working on other drivers
can have a stable core to build on.

Ambar
> Basically, Bayonne 2 will have sip, h323, and Voicetronix in 
> the primary 
> distro.  The external nonfree driver package can also be 
> adapted to work 
> with it as well as with head later, so those drivers do not 
> need to be 
> complete for 1.0 core package to be.  It would have a subset of the 
> current ivrscript binding, mostly related to the truelly 
> stable parts. 
> You would be able to generate outgoing calls through the fifo.
> 
> I do believe it is possible to come up with a binding plugin, perhaps 
> called "classic", which could do most of the original Bayonne 
> "1" 1.2.x 
> script syntax, now that ivrscript is itself a plugin.  Would this be 
> worth doing?  Should it be done for a 1.0 release?
> 
> [email protected] wrote:
> > Thumbs up from my end. BTW.. How the bayonne 2 1.0 compare 
> to current
> > bayonne 1.2.x series? Also what about issues relating to 
> migration of
> > existing scripts that work under bayonne 1.2.x?