Re: Future of Bayonne

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes, I largely agree, which is where I was going with radically
simplifying the server.  The core things that I think make Bayonne
"bayonne" are a plugable driver tree and state engine; and server to
load those driver and run the script engine, manage a libexec type
gateway, and bind additional plugins.  I am not sure if there is really
anything else that is "essential".

Peter Krapfl wrote:
> A very stable, basic version with only a few features - more or less a
> server core,
> where everybody can adds what he or she wants - and a easier driver
> interface.
> 
> That's my personal opinion.
> To many features - to many problems.
> We should keep it simple.
> 
> Cheers
> Peter
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCUwGSJlWtSTiTVsYRAsVCAJ976W+f2j0FCh7tYdul/m1bkD0PeACeJS1b
fM8mjRoGfBUa3MhHr6Ojpv4=
=vr4b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Bayonne-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bayonne-devel

begin:vcard
fn:David Sugar
n:Sugar;David
org:GNU Project
adr:;;23 Olin Drive;Cape May Court House;NJ;08210;USA
email;internet:[email protected]
tel;home:+1 609 465 5336
tel;cell:+1 609 408 7488
note:AIM: gnutelephony
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.gnu.org/software/bayonne
version:2.1
end:vcard