RE: Intel Dialogic System Release 6.1 and Bayonne

"Julien Chavanton" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.bayonne.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Something annoying, 6.1 is not supporting spring ware board ;(

I think the most updated drivers (this year) is:

Intel(r) Dialogic(r) System Release 5.1 Feature Pack 2 for Linux Service
Update 45.

http://resource.intel.com/telecom/support/releases/unix51/linux51fp1/Onl
doc/update/relnotes.pdf

I hope Intel/Dialogic can give you a free version to encourage everybody
to purchase this drivers update.

I have problem with memory limitation on previous drivers; I was never
able to set more the 512 MB on my Linux server.

Julien



-----Original Message-----
From: bayonne-devel-bounces+j.chavanton=oneworldinteractive.com@gnu.org
[mailto:[email protected]
g] On Behalf Of David Sugar
Sent: August 2, 2005 6:42 AM
To: Ambar Roy
Cc: 'mailing_list_bayonne-devel'
Subject: Re: [Bayonne-devel] Intel Dialogic System Release 6.1 and
Bayonne

I would like to setup a test system here to get the bayonne2 dialogic 
drivers back to an operational level sometime this year, but what 
distros is 6.1 directly supporting?

Ambar Roy wrote:
> Tony,
> 
> I have no idea on 6.1 release under linux except what I have read on
intel
> site. My experience on windows has shown that the 6.x series should be
> backward compatible with 5.x series. Gc_basic_call_model is a sample
gc app
> that comes with dialogic system release.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ambar Roy
> 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Tony Stocker [mailto:[email protected]] 
>>Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 10:18 PM
>>To: mailing_list_bayonne-devel
>>Subject: Re: [Bayonne-devel] Intel Dialogic System Release 
>>6.1 and Bayonne
>>
>>Ambar,
>>
>>I was hoping to run Bayonne on a Mandrake 10.x system and it looked
>>from the documentation that the 5.1 materials weren't rated to run on
>>it, whereas the 6.1 suggests that it at least supports 10.1.
>>
>>Do you think the 6.1 package might contain all of the elements that
>>used to be in the three 5.1 packages?
>>
>>Is the Gc_basic_call_model a program?  If so, where can I find it?
>>
>>Thanks for the help.
>>
>>Tony
>>
>>On 7/26/05, mailing_list_bayonne-devel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tony,
>>>
>>>You can always download and run SR 5.1 and install the SP1. 
>>
>>Although 6.1
>>
>>>should be fully backward compatible with 5.1.
>>>
>>>First set up 6.1 and run some sample programs. 
>>
>>Gc_basic_call_model is a good
>>
>>>one to try. And then try running bayonne.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Ambar Roy
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Tony Stocker [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 2:21 AM
>>>>To: [email protected]
>>>>Subject: [Bayonne-devel] Intel Dialogic System Release 
>>
>>6.1 and Bayonne
>>
>>>>Hello All,
>>>>
>>>>We recently purchased an Intel Dialogic D/41-JCT-LS board and the
>>>>System Release 6.1 for Linux with the intention of 
>>
>>installing it for
>>
>>>>use with Bayonne.  However the documentation at
>>>>http://www.gnu.org/software/bayonne/documentation.html 
>>
>>seems to refer
>>
>>>>only to version 5.1 and talks about needing three 
>>
>>different packages
>>
>>>>(Service Release, Service Pack, Feature Pack) and the CD that we
>>>>received from Intel only seems to have one package on it.
>>>>
>>>>I'm curious to know if anyone has setup Bayonne with a 
>>
>>Dialogic board
>>
>>>>and the 6.1 system release.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>Tony
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Bayonne-devel mailing list
>>>>[email protected]
>>>>http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bayonne-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Bayonne-devel mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bayonne-devel
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bayonne-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bayonne-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.