RE: [PATCH v1 2/2] Support x86 ACE ISA

"Hu, Lin1" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.binutils
Message-ID <DS4PPF8140589512BC3BF3700D7EEE3F1FBA6F72@DS4PPF814058951.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
> From: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2026 1:59 PM
> On 30.06.2026 05:17, Hu, Lin1 wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ganesh Gopalasubramanian <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2026 7:56 PM
> >>
> >> @@ -4253,6 +4257,7 @@ install_template (const insn_template *t)
> >>  	}
> >>
> >>        if ((maybe_cpu (t, CpuCMPCCXADD) || maybe_cpu (t, CpuAMX_TILE)
> >> +	   || maybe_cpu (t, CpuACE)
> >
> > Outer condition is if (t->opcode_modifier.vex && t->opcode_modifier.evex),
> seems that the line is invalid.
> 
> "invalid" as in "unnecessary"? Else please explain.
> 
> Also, as a general remark: Please trim reply context, especially when what you
> reply to was large.
>

Yes, it's unnecessary. ACE instructions don't set vex and evex at the same time.

BRs,
Lin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.