RE: [PATCH v1 2/2] Support x86 ACE ISA
"Hu, Lin1" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.binutils |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DS4PPF8140589512BC3BF3700D7EEE3F1FBA6F72@DS4PPF814058951.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> |
> From: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2026 1:59 PM > On 30.06.2026 05:17, Hu, Lin1 wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Ganesh Gopalasubramanian <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2026 7:56 PM > >> > >> @@ -4253,6 +4257,7 @@ install_template (const insn_template *t) > >> } > >> > >> if ((maybe_cpu (t, CpuCMPCCXADD) || maybe_cpu (t, CpuAMX_TILE) > >> + || maybe_cpu (t, CpuACE) > > > > Outer condition is if (t->opcode_modifier.vex && t->opcode_modifier.evex), > seems that the line is invalid. > > "invalid" as in "unnecessary"? Else please explain. > > Also, as a general remark: Please trim reply context, especially when what you > reply to was large. > Yes, it's unnecessary. ACE instructions don't set vex and evex at the same time. BRs, Lin